The reasons behind KDP attack on Islamic Union headquarters

By Kamal Chomani:

Elections victories in Tunisia, Morocco and Egypt by Islamic Brotherhood parties have created a serious threat for the two ruling Kurdish parties and, in particular, for the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP). The recent setting on fire of the Kurdistan Islamic Union’s (KIU) headquarters in Duhok should be analyzed according to its ‘time and location’ in order to understand the reasons behind this attack.

According to the political parties’ ‘clout division’ of the Kurdistan region’s four provinces, Duhok belongs to the KDP, Sulaymaniyah to the Gorran Movement, Kirkuk to the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) and Arbil is at the centre of a conflict involving almost all the parties. Arbil cannot be considered as one party’s city in terms of clout since there is serious competition. In each city in which one party has the majority, there is also a second party – a different one for each city.

The KDP cannot accept any rival in Duhok as a counterpart. Neither the Gorran movement nor the PUK can seriously confront the KDP and their increased strength doesn’t compare to the growth of the KIU which, over the past five years, has thrived in Duhok and shown that it is the real local rival to the KDP.

The KIU’s vote in the elections has dramatically increased during this period.

In the January 30, 2005 elections, the KIU got 19,000 votes.

In the December 15, 2005 elections, the KIU increased its votes to 32,000 votes.

In the July 25, 2009 Kurdish general elections, the KIU sustained its position and got 32,000 votes. (Even though the Gorran Movement emerged as the main opposition party, this didn’t affect the strengthening of the KIU).

In the March 7, 2010 Iraqi General Election, the KIU secured its best-ever result with 63,000 votes.

The increase over five years is 44,000 votes!

This shocked the KDP. First, because the KIU doesn’t have a long history and is not in power to distribute positions and money like the KDP does. Second, because, for the KDP, Duhok is the heart of the party and no one should be allowed to get stronger than it.

Duhoki people join the KIU because of two main reasons.

First, from 1994 (the year that the KIU was founded) there was the Kurdish civil war between the two ruling parties and people in Duhok who were not KDP members and were against the existing political situation wanted to change the corrupt and fascist policy of the KDP. At that time support for the PUK was harshly prohibited, even though the party had left Duhok. When the KIU emerged, the KDP didn’t make too many obstacles because it wanted to boast of a diversity of political parties in the area and because the KIU is not an armed force – they do not believe in arms. Eventually people joined the KIU, not only to express opposition to the KDP but also because they believed in the KIU’s ideology and policies and wanted to pursue a civil, legal and political struggle to change the situation.

Second, in general, Duhoki people are more conservative than the people of Sulaymaniyah.

The KDP has been frightened by the increasing Islamic clout in the area (with the Islamic Group, led by Ali Bapir, also active in Duhok). When Bashar Al-Asad is toppled and the Islamic Brotherhood parties win power in Syria, following their successes in Tunisia, Morocco and Egypt, this will encourage the Islamic parties and people of Kurdistan. These changes will definitely inspire the Islamic parties and people to continue their freedom struggle to tackle the corrupt and undemocratic system of the Kurdistan region.

The record of Islamic parties in power in the Middle East and North Africa will be significant for Kurdish people. If they do well in terms of providing more services, more freedoms and a democratic governance, this will boost their support in Kurdistan.

The systems arising from the Arab revolutions will show us whether or not the Islamic parties will promote ‘fundamentalist rule’ and pose a threat to democracy and individual freedoms.

The KDP is afraid of renewed demonstrations in the Kurdistan region. The only force that can protest in Duhok against the current situation is the KIU. The opposition parties have already announced their disappointment with the continued unsolved problems and corruption. Their speeches indicate that they are reorganizing to resume the protests if they do not get what they ask for.

In conclusion, the KDP set the KIU’s offices on fire to tell the KIU’s supporters: “Even when you have done nothing we can set your offices on fire and capture some of your leaders. If you have any desire to do what the Islamic Brotherhood has done elsewhere in the region, we will be harsher against you”.

11 Responses to The reasons behind KDP attack on Islamic Union headquarters
  1. Sissy Danninger
    December 6, 2011 | 23:25

    Violence is not a promising tool for nation-building, on the contrary. This applies to those responsible of the Autonomous Region as well as to any political party or religious community there. Especially the Kurds, having been victimized so brutally and frequently in their long history should be perfectly aware of this fact. In a democratic and tolerant society political competition has to apply political means. One of the best among those is to clearly fix the strict separation of state- and civil matters from all sorts of religious dogms in a common and respected constitution. Islamic parties with convincing social programmes will probably play a growing role not just in the emerging new Arab states. As long as they remain within the spectrum of non-violent democratic parties they should not be mixed up with Islamists and terrorists, but be permitted and even encouraged to contribute their share. Everything else may easily prove to be utterly counterproductive – whether we like it or not.

    • دڵشاد خۆشناو
      December 8, 2011 | 12:01

      Violence would be deadly for Kurdistan and the fate of millions. No one should accept such a development.
      The changes in the ME are not as promising as many anticipated. The rise of Muslim Brothers and Salafists tells us a disaster is coming over us.
      It would be catastrophic if those ideas and forces would find their way into Kurdistan through the kurdish Islamic parties and it would be completely irresponsible because Kurds were always relatively tolerant to non-muslims and this tradition shouldn’t be allowed to be destroyed, under no circumnstances.

      No one should accept a violent mob ruling the streets and attack this and that which they don’t like.
      This should be valid for everyone, be it the Islamic or KRG parties.

      Slaw u rez
      Dilshad Xoshnaw

      • Soran
        December 9, 2011 | 10:51

        Kaka Dilshad,
        Personally I would support a secular party that beleives in true libralism.The problem we don not seem to have any appetite for democracy when it comes to free elections.For argument sake if a true election brought an islamic party to power what would we do?To my mind to aleinating the kurdish islamic parties from the political scene won’t do us any favour and only encourages underground work.You only need to look at what they did in Algeria when they were denied the election results.On the other hand moderate islam seems to have done rather well in Turkey.Your last quesion poses a huge dilemma for all of us and our understanding of democracy.This argument is part of the scaremongering tactics that the current establishment has suuccefuly manged to spread amongst us,either us or the hell of islam.Rather than resorting to this tactic,we ,the intellect ,have to do a quite reading of the election results in Tunisia and Egypt and what made people do this.Finally let me declare this disinterest,I have never and will never vote for an islamic party.

  2. دڵشاد خۆشناو
    December 7, 2011 | 00:20

    1- first of all, you call yourself “Chomani” and if I am not completely wrong Choman is a town which belongs to Hawler.
    I am disappointed and puzzled how a Kurd, who lives in the Hawler province, can call Hawler Arbil?

    I know of course of a few motives why some people use Erbil/Irbil or Arbil but I am lost when trying to understand why an intelligent person like yourself does it?

    2- it is breath taking what routes and chains of reasoning some Kurds are prepared to go just to prove one of their preset judgements which is PDK/Barzani are evil fascists etc….

    So, the exercize is about bending the facts so often until they fit the box which is “Barzanis/PDk are fascists”.

    The core of your theory is that PDK was scared of the strengthening of YekGirtu so they burnt down their offices in Zaxo.

    That doesn’t make any sense to me because that would definitely lead to more votes for YekFGirtu because naturally even people who did not support YekGirtu before would start to sympathize with them because of the outrage such a PDK behaviour would cause.

    If you are really intersted in finding the facts behind the facts just ask yourself, what the visit of Salahaddin Behaaddin in Cairo at this very moment of crisis and his talks with the Egyptian Muslim Brother mean?

    It is a show of defiance against PDK/KRG and it smells very much like going to Cairo to take immediate orders about what and how to do it.

    It must be an outrage for every Kurdistani and everyone who cares about being an islamic republic or not that Mr. Behaaddin choses the Muslim Brothers as his authority reference to confer with.

    While I respect the islamic religion of my people and their right to being free in that I reject being ruled by an islamic republic.
    That would be indeed a scary view of our future.

    For me it becomes clearer by the hour that YekGirtu is not the victim. On the contrary they seem to have become so bold that the yactivley try to cause disorder and chaos and defy PDK/KRG.
    It is yet not clear whether they had any orders from Cairo/Ankara/Riadh or did they just get too enthusiastic about the success by the Muslim Brothers in Egypt and elsewhere.
    If you know teh Muslim brothers in Kurdistan and Iraq you would also know that this has been their dream for long that it would be heaven if one day the Muslim Brothers were to rule any of thos ME countries and they would be backed by such a power.

    Now they seem to have reached this dream.

    By the way, in Egypt the Salafists are getting stronger and stronger which would definitely change the game again.

    Slaw u rez

    • Hawlery
      December 8, 2011 | 16:24

      Salahaddin Behaaddin didn’t visit Cairo.
      Don’t tell a lie like it is a fact and say “in fakt”. Don’t replay others lie. Kurdistan Tv lie about it. They say he is in Eqypten, while he is in Hawler and meeting with his party. That is a fact, because he is been filmed in the meeting.

      • دڵشاد خۆشناو
        December 8, 2011 | 19:19

        I really hope that you are right and he didn’t visit Cairo for talks with the Muslim Brothers at this moment.
        I would be really pleased because otherwise it would be a very bad signal.
        I think I read that in Hawlati and not Kurdistan Tv. I will try to find the news and send you the link.

      • دڵشاد خۆشناو
        December 8, 2011 | 22:36

        just for your information:

        this is one place where I saw the news:

        http://www.rubernet.net/news/3556-ugr-ruber.html

        • Hawlery
          December 9, 2011 | 09:50

          still the visit is not truth, no matter who says it.

          with all my recpect to you and them.

    • Hawlery
      December 8, 2011 | 16:32

      See for yourself, if you want the truth, who is behind all this.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&hl=da&v=wG5yOUkdbg0

  3. Baqi Barzani
    December 7, 2011 | 00:36

    Kirkuk, Duhok, Sulaimania, And Hawler belong to no political party. They are all inseparable parts of an independent Kurdistan. That is why we need to rearm and reinforce our military to the highest level possible. A military that is consisted of Kurds from all over Kurdistan, and whose primary mission is to maintain the rule of law, ensure protection of civilians lives and disallow political parties to flout existing laws for the sake of its own continued existence or interests.

    Nice piece Kaka Kamal.

  4. Baqi Barzani
    December 7, 2011 | 00:41

    Kirkuk, Duhok, Sulaimania, And Hawler belong to no political party. They are inseparable parts of an independent Kurdistan. That is why we need to rearm and reinforce our military to the highest level possible. A military that is consisted of Kurds from all over Kurdistan, and whose primary mission is to maintain the rule of law, ensure protection of civilians lives and disallow political parties to flout all existing laws for the sake of their own continued existence or interests.
    Our defense must be independent and free of partisan influence.

    Nice piece Kaka Kamal!

Leave a Reply

Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

Trackback URL https://kurdistantribune.com/reasons-behind-kdp-attack-on-islamic-union-headquarters/trackback/